Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs SECIX
RMFEX vs SECIX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SECIX
RMFEX vs SECIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SECIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Hold and SECIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. SECIX (72M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than SECIX: RMFEX (1.45) vs SECIX (0.65). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SECIX: RMFEX (24 years) vs SECIX (82 years). SECIX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). SECIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SECIX: RMFEX (250) vs SECIX (2500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.65 vs. SECIX (4.71). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.72 vs. SECIX (-0.82).
| RMFEX | SECIX | RMFEX / SECIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.10 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.38 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 82 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.666 | 6.311 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 72M | 162,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.65 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.65 | 4.71 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.38 | 6.13 | 593% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.72 | -0.82 | -4,739% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.66 | 33.85 | 309% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement