Ad is loading...
RMFEX vs SUVCX
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.17
Change-$0.24 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.07B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$10.20
Change-$0.07 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.23M
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SUVCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. SUVCX (241M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: SUVCX (2.45) vs RMFEX (1.65). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFEX (23 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFEX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. SUVCX (-9.50). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.88 vs. SUVCX (43.78).
| RMFEX | SUVCX | RMFEX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.13 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.46 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.110 | 1.383 | 225% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 241M | 42,739% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 2.45 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | -9.50 | -69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.63 | -11.33 | -173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | 43.78 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.18 | -21.43 | -318% |