Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs SUVCX
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.02
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$10.41
Change+$0.10 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.25M
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SUVCX (239M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: SUVCX (2.36) vs RMFEX (1.58). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFEX (23 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFEX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. SUVCX (-7.87). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.01 vs. SUVCX (13.54).
| RMFEX | SUVCX | RMFEX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.13 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.46 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.053 | 1.877 | 322% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 239M | 43,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 2.36 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.37 | -7.87 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.90 | -14.97 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.01 | 13.54 | 399% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.06 | -16.58 | -465% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement