Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs SUVCX
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.62
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$10.58
Change+$0.11 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.98M
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. SUVCX (242M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: SUVCX (2.36) vs RMFEX (1.58). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFEX (23 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFEX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. SUVCX (-5.70). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.41 vs. SUVCX (34.94).
| RMFEX | SUVCX | RMFEX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.13 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.46 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.546 | 3.459 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 242M | 43,802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 2.36 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | -5.70 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.58 | -5.12 | -538% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.41 | 34.94 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.97 | -14.78 | -561% |