Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs SUVCX
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SUVCX
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.97
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val C
Price$11.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.22M
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SUVCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SUVCX (251M). SUVCX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: SUVCX (2.30) vs RMFEX (1.51). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFEX (23 years) vs SUVCX (24 years). SUVCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFEX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. SUVCX (-6.17). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.62 vs. SUVCX (28.18).
| RMFEX | SUVCX | RMFEX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.13 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.46 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.858 | 9.190 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 251M | 43,426% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.30 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | -6.17 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.46 | -1.94 | -1,567% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.62 | 28.18 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.75 | -4.93 | -2,003% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement