Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs SUVCX
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SUVCX
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SUVCX (264M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than SUVCX: RMFEX (1.42) vs SUVCX (0.55). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFEX (24 years) vs SUVCX (25 years). SUVCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFEX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). SUVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. RMFEX (9.23). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. SUVCX (-5.41).
| RMFEX | SUVCX | RMFEX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.13 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.52 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.303 | 18.338 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 264M | 44,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.55 | 260% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 10.04 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.13 | 12.93 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.39 | -5.41 | -728% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.14 | 7.49 | 1,325% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement