Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs SUVCX
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs SUVCX
RMFEX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Hold and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. SUVCX (257M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than SUVCX: RMFEX (1.45) vs SUVCX (0.56). RMFEX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMFEX (24 years) vs SUVCX (25 years). SUVCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMFEX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.46 vs. SUVCX (9.50). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. SUVCX (-13.31).
| RMFEX | SUVCX | RMFEX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.13 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.52 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.987 | 13.678 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 257M | 44,747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.56 | 259% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 9.50 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.96 | 13.16 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.97 | -13.31 | -270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.50 | 5.57 | 1,788% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers