Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs TRLCX
RMFEX vs TRLCX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs TRLCX
RMFEX vs TRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. TRLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and TRLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TRLCX (6.46B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than TRLCX: RMFEX (1.42) vs TRLCX (1.17). RMFEX was incepted earlier than TRLCX: RMFEX (24 years) vs TRLCX (24 years). TRLCX (0.65) and RMFEX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TRLCX (17.00). TRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: TRLCX (0) vs RMFEX (250). TRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.44 vs. RMFEX (9.23). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. TRLCX (31.28).
| RMFEX | TRLCX | RMFEX / TRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.65 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.303 | 15.466 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 6.46B | 1,828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.17 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 16.44 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.13 | 41.02 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.39 | 31.28 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.14 | 73.79 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement