Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs WLCVX
RMFEX vs WLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs WLCVX
RMFEX vs WLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. WLCVX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and WLCVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WLCVX (182M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than WLCVX: RMFEX (1.42) vs WLCVX (1.16). RMFEX was incepted earlier than WLCVX: RMFEX (24 years) vs WLCVX (30 years). WLCVX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). WLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCVX: RMFEX (250) vs WLCVX (250000). WLCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.54 vs. RMFEX (9.23). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. WLCVX (11.52).
| RMFEX | WLCVX | RMFEX / WLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.03 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.303 | 11.651 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 182M | 64,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.16 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 10.54 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.13 | 30.90 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.39 | 11.52 | 342% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.14 | 42.25 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement