Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs WLCVX
RMFEX vs WLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs WLCVX
RMFEX vs WLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. WLCVX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Hold and WLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. WLCVX (181M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than WLCVX: RMFEX (1.45) vs WLCVX (1.17). RMFEX was incepted earlier than WLCVX: RMFEX (24 years) vs WLCVX (30 years). WLCVX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). WLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCVX: RMFEX (250) vs WLCVX (250000). WLCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. RMFEX (10.46). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. WLCVX (8.20).
| RMFEX | WLCVX | RMFEX / WLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.00 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.03 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.987 | 9.174 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 181M | 63,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.17 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 12.53 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.96 | 34.48 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.97 | 8.20 | 439% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.50 | 42.82 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers