Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMFEX vs WWLAX
RMFEX vs WWLAX Comparison
Open Charts RMFEX vs WWLAX
RMFEX vs WWLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMFEX vs. WWLAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMFEX is a Buy and WWLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WWLAX (76.2M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than WWLAX: RMFEX (1.42) vs WWLAX (0.92). RMFEX was incepted earlier than WWLAX: RMFEX (24 years) vs WWLAX (19 years). WWLAX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). WWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWLAX: RMFEX (250) vs WWLAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. WWLAX (-7.52). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. WWLAX (-7.80).
| RMFEX | WWLAX | RMFEX / WWLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.80 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.88 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.303 | 8.390 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 76.2M | 154,856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.92 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | -7.52 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.13 | 2.04 | 1,770% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.39 | -7.80 | -505% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.14 | 25.15 | 394% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement