RMIAF
Price
$0.76
Change
+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.94M
WSC
Price
$23.71
Change
+$0.09 (+0.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.32B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMIAF vs WSC

Header iconRMIAF vs WSC Comparison
Open Charts RMIAF vs WSCBanner chart's image
Automotive Fin
Price$0.76
Change+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization13.94M
WillScot Holdings
Price$23.71
Change+$0.09 (+0.38%)
Volume$1.78M
Capitalization4.32B
RMIAF vs WSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMIAF vs. WSC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMIAF is a Hold and WSC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (RMIAF: $0.76 vs. WSC: $23.71)
Brand notoriety: RMIAF and WSC are both not notable
RMIAF represents the Savings Banks, while WSC is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMIAF: 100% vs. WSC: 80%
Market capitalization -- RMIAF: $13.94M vs. WSC: $4.32B
RMIAF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $13.94M. WSC’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $666.17B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $62.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.15B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMIAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RMIAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMIAF is a better buy in the long-term than WSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WSC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WSC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

RMIAF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WSC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.21%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

WSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.52% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.01% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSC($4.32B) has a higher market cap than RMIAF($13.9M). WSC has higher P/E ratio than RMIAF: WSC (40.19) vs RMIAF (9.53). RMIAF YTD gains are higher at: 38.081 vs. WSC (-28.563). WSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 794M vs. RMIAF (2.16M). RMIAF has more cash in the bank: 21.7M vs. WSC (13.3K). WSC has higher revenues than RMIAF: WSC (2.35B) vs RMIAF (3.04M).
RMIAFWSCRMIAF / WSC
Capitalization13.9M4.32B0%
EBITDA2.16M794M0%
Gain YTD38.081-28.563-133%
P/E Ratio9.5340.1924%
Revenue3.04M2.35B0%
Total Cash21.7M13.3K163,158%
Total DebtN/A3.96B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMIAF vs WSC: Fundamental Ratings
RMIAF
WSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
7670
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4182
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMIAF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSC (82) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RMIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

WSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RMIAF (100) in the null industry. This means that WSC’s stock grew similarly to RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

WSC's SMR Rating (70) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RMIAF (76) in the null industry. This means that WSC’s stock grew similarly to RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSC (82) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RMIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as WSC (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RMIAF’s stock grew similarly to WSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMIAFWSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCYX0.890.02
+2.43%
SCYNEXIS
PFE24.880.34
+1.39%
Pfizer
CTGO21.580.19
+0.89%
Contango ORE
EPRT30.800.06
+0.20%
Essential Properties Realty Trust
MRC15.10-0.05
-0.33%
MRC Global

RMIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMIAF and RM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMIAF and RM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMIAF
1D Price
Change %
RMIAF100%
N/A
RM - RMIAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
WSC - RMIAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
SUIG - RMIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
PRPS - RMIAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIXGF - RMIAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSC has been loosely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WSC jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSC
1D Price
Change %
WSC100%
+0.38%
OMF - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
SYF - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
URI - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
R - WSC
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MGRC - WSC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More