RMIAF
Price
$0.76
Change
+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.32M
WSC
Price
$28.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.83B
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMIAF vs WSC

Header iconRMIAF vs WSC Comparison
Open Charts RMIAF vs WSCBanner chart's image
Automotive Fin
Price$0.76
Change+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization10.32M
WillScot Holdings
Price$28.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$105.43K
Capitalization8.83B
RMIAF vs WSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RMIAF vs. WSC commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMIAF is a Hold and WSC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (RMIAF: $0.76 vs. WSC: $28.90)
Brand notoriety: RMIAF and WSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RMIAF: 305% vs. WSC: 84%
Market capitalization -- RMIAF: $10.32M vs. WSC: $8.83B
RMIAF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $10.32M. WSC’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $8.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RMIAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RMIAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMIAF is a better buy in the long-term than WSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RMIAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RMIAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WSC is a better buy in the short-term than RMIAF.

Price Growth

RMIAF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WSC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +5.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

WSC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+2.42% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSC($8.83B) has a higher market cap than RMIAF($10.3M). RMIAF YTD gains are higher at: 38.081 vs. WSC (-13.182). WSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. RMIAF (27.7K). RMIAF has more cash in the bank: 22M vs. WSC (11M). RMIAF has less debt than WSC: RMIAF (27.6M) vs WSC (3.8B). WSC has higher revenues than RMIAF: WSC (2.37B) vs RMIAF (929K).
RMIAFWSCRMIAF / WSC
Capitalization10.3M8.83B0%
EBITDA27.7K1.01B0%
Gain YTD38.081-13.182-289%
P/E RatioN/A26.13-
Revenue929K2.37B0%
Total Cash22M11M200%
Total Debt27.6M3.8B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMIAF vs WSC: Fundamental Ratings
RMIAF
WSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
459
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
7588
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
172
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMIAF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSC (94) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RMIAF’s stock grew significantly faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

WSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMIAF (100) in the null industry. This means that WSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as WSC (88) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RMIAF’s stock grew similarly to WSC’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as WSC (61) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RMIAF’s stock grew similarly to WSC’s over the last 12 months.

WSC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RMIAF (17) in the null industry. This means that WSC’s stock grew similarly to RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMIAFWSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GPRE6.520.30
+4.74%
Green Plains
GTLS168.155.55
+3.41%
Chart Industries
RENB0.280.01
+2.68%
Renovaro
JPM292.001.59
+0.55%
JPMorgan Chase & Co
WLFC133.60-3.76
-2.74%
Willis Lease Finance Corp

RMIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMIAF and RM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMIAF and RM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMIAF
1D Price
Change %
RMIAF100%
N/A
RM - RMIAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.40%
WSC - RMIAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
MCVT - RMIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
PRPS - RMIAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIXGF - RMIAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSC has been loosely correlated with MGRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WSC jumps, then MGRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSC
1D Price
Change %
WSC100%
+1.83%
MGRC - WSC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
URI - WSC
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
OMF - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
R - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
AXP - WSC
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More