OMF
Price
$62.75
Change
+$0.69 (+1.11%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
7.22B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WSC
Price
$18.66
Change
-$0.02 (-0.11%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.38B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OMF vs WSC

OMF vs WSC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OMF vs. WSC commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OMF is a Hold and WSC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($7.22B) has a higher market cap than WSC($3.38B). WSC has higher P/E ratio than OMF: WSC (17.87) vs OMF (9.46). WSC YTD gains are higher at: 0.058 vs. OMF (-1.970). WSC has less debt than OMF: WSC (3.79B) vs OMF (22.8B). OMF has higher revenues than WSC: OMF (5.12B) vs WSC (2.29B).
OMFWSCOMF / WSC
Capitalization7.22B3.38B213%
EBITDAN/A552M-
Gain YTD-1.9700.058-3,368%
P/E Ratio9.4617.8753%
Revenue5.12B2.29B223%
Total CashN/A18.2M-
Total Debt22.8B3.79B601%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF vs WSC: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
WSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6458
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40100
SMR RATING
1..100
793
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4664
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSC (68). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSC (100). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSC (93). This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WSC (64). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to WSC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSC (100). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OMFWSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (OMF: $62.75 vs. WSC: $18.66)
Brand notoriety: OMF and WSC are both not notable
OMF represents the Savings Banks, while WSC is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OMF: 73% vs. WSC: 51%
Market capitalization -- OMF: $7.22B vs. WSC: $3.38B
OMF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $7.22B. WSC’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $3.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $1.46M to $696.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $2.17K to $61.57B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $34.3B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $8.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while WSC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • OMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than WSC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WSC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both OMF and WSC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

OMF (@Savings Banks) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while WSC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -6.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -3.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

WSC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.79% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-3.86% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

View a ticker or compare two or three
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBHG21.850.01
+0.05%
iShares® iBonds® 2027 Term HY & Inc ETF
IGCB44.26N/A
N/A
TCW Corporate Bond ETF
SBIT36.58-0.18
-0.49%
ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF
REW11.36-0.28
-2.41%
ProShares UltraShort Technology
NLR113.22-4.61
-3.91%
VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+1.11%
SYF - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
ALLY - OMF
73%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
R - OMF
72%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
COF - OMF
71%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
URI - OMF
70%
Closely correlated
+0.00%
More

WSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSC has been loosely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WSC jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSC
1D Price
Change %
WSC100%
-0.13%
OMF - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
SYF - WSC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
AXP - WSC
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
COF - WSC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
ENVA - WSC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More