Ad is loading...
RMQCX vs TEPIX
RMQCX vs TEPIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQCX vs. TEPIX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQCX is a Hold and TEPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQCX has more cash in the bank: 678M vs. TEPIX (47M). TEPIX (0.32) and RMQCX (0.31) have matching dividends . RMQCX was incepted earlier than TEPIX: RMQCX (10 years) vs TEPIX (25 years). RMQCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than TEPIX (1.55). RMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. TEPIX (116.00). RMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEPIX: RMQCX (2500) vs TEPIX (15000). TEPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.98 vs. RMQCX (-21.20). TEPIX (100.04) and RMQCX (97.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMQCX | TEPIX | RMQCX / TEPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.55 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 1.55 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -26.721 | -25.917 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 678M | 47M | 1,443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.32 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.20 | -17.98 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.21 | 7.38 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.22 | 100.04 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 533.31 | 423.29 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...