Ad is loading...
RMQHX vs UGPIX
RMQHX vs UGPIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMQHX vs. UGPIX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMQHX is a Buy and UGPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQHX has more cash in the bank: 570M vs. UGPIX (16.5M). UGPIX pays higher dividends than RMQHX: UGPIX (2.05) vs RMQHX (0.28). RMQHX was incepted earlier than UGPIX: RMQHX (10 years) vs UGPIX (17 years). RMQHX (1.95) is less costly to investors than UGPIX (1.80). RMQHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. UGPIX (159.00). RMQHX has a lower initial minimum investment than UGPIX: RMQHX (2500) vs UGPIX (15000). UGPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.48 vs. RMQHX (-34.69). RMQHX return over 5 years is better than : 109.19 vs. UGPIX (-82.84).
| RMQHX | UGPIX | RMQHX / UGPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.80 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.80 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -36.378 | -10.443 | 348% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 16.5M | 3,455% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 2.05 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | -34.69 | -16.48 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.75 | -51.75 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.19 | -82.84 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 529.05 | -87.90 | -602% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers