RNG
Price
$26.94
Change
-$0.13 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.21B
48 days until earnings call
ZM
Price
$77.90
Change
+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.11B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RNG vs ZM

Header iconRNG vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts RNG vs ZMBanner chart's image
RINGCENTRAL
Price$26.94
Change-$0.13 (-0.48%)
Volume$1.47M
Capitalization3.21B
Zoom Communications
Price$77.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Volume$1.63M
Capitalization20.11B
RNG vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RNG vs. ZM commentary
Jun 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNG is a Hold and ZM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 18, 2025
Stock price -- (RNG: $26.94 vs. ZM: $77.90)
Brand notoriety: RNG: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RNG: 142% vs. ZM: 77%
Market capitalization -- RNG: $3.21B vs. ZM: $20.11B
RNG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.21B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RNG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RNG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the long-term than RNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RNG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RNG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the short-term than RNG.

Price Growth

RNG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.46% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +59.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

RNG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.73% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($20.1B) has a higher market cap than RNG($3.21B). ZM YTD gains are higher at: -4.546 vs. RNG (-23.051). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 630M vs. RNG (113M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. RNG (222M). ZM has less debt than RNG: ZM (73M) vs RNG (1.59B). ZM has higher revenues than RNG: ZM (4.53B) vs RNG (2.2B).
RNGZMRNG / ZM
Capitalization3.21B20.1B16%
EBITDA113M630M18%
Gain YTD-23.051-4.546507%
P/E RatioN/A31.27-
Revenue2.2B4.53B49%
Total Cash222M6.96B3%
Total Debt1.59B73M2,178%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNG vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
RNG
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6954
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10061
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10037
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZM's Valuation (70) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RNG (91). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to RNG’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RNG (100). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to RNG’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's SMR Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNG (100). This means that ZM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNG’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RNG (62). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to RNG’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNG (100). This means that ZM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RNGZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OLB2.030.04
+2.16%
OLB Group Inc. (The)
CGEN1.65N/A
N/A
Compugen Ltd
FBP19.36-0.24
-1.22%
First BanCorp
CFG40.45-0.56
-1.37%
Citizens Financial Group
DX12.07-0.23
-1.87%
Dynex Capital