Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNGCX vs RNPAX
RNGCX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts RNGCX vs RNPAX
RNGCX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNGCX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNGCX is a Hold and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. RNGCX (51.4B). RNPAX pays higher dividends than RNGCX: RNPAX (0.36) vs RNGCX (0.00). RNGCX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: RNGCX (24 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNGCX (1.05). RNGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNGCX (250) and RNPAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.40 vs. RNPAX (11.98). RNGCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. RNPAX (10.66).
| RNGCX | RNPAX | RNGCX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.49 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.49 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.806 | 6.070 | 392% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.4B | 172B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.40 | 11.98 | 320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.52 | 37.06 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.84 | 10.66 | 345% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.00 | 109.78 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement