Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNGCX vs RNPFX
RNGCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts RNGCX vs RNPFX
RNGCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNGCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNGCX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. RNGCX (51.4B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than RNGCX: RNPFX (1.18) vs RNGCX (0.00). RNGCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: RNGCX (24 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). RNGCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). RNGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNGCX (250) and RNPFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.40 vs. RNPFX (13.73). RNGCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. RNPFX (17.55).
| RNGCX | RNPFX | RNGCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.45 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.45 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.806 | 6.578 | 362% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.4B | 172B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.40 | 13.73 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.52 | 43.12 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.84 | 17.55 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.00 | 127.31 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers