Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNGCX vs RNPFX
RNGCX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts RNGCX vs RNPFX
RNGCX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNGCX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNGCX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. RNGCX (51.8B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than RNGCX: RNPFX (1.19) vs RNGCX (0.00). RNGCX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: RNGCX (24 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). RNGCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). RNGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNGCX (250) and RNPFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.03 vs. RNPFX (7.77). RNGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.69 vs. RNPFX (14.74).
| RNGCX | RNPFX | RNGCX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.45 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.45 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.846 | 5.472 | 308% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.8B | 170B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.03 | 7.77 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.45 | 35.68 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.69 | 14.74 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.88 | 111.47 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers