Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNGFX vs RNPAX
RNGFX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts RNGFX vs RNPAX
RNGFX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNGFX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNGFX is a Hold and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. RNGFX (50B). RNPAX pays higher dividends than RNGFX: RNPAX (0.36) vs RNGFX (0.00). RNGFX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: RNGFX (24 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RNGFX (0.45). RNGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNGFX (250) and RNPAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.45 vs. RNPAX (1.43). RNGFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.68 vs. RNPAX (4.70).
| RNGFX | RNPAX | RNGFX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.49 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.49 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.473 | 5.231 | 315% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50B | 169B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.45 | 1.43 | 1,011% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.64 | 34.64 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.68 | 4.70 | 611% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.21 | 94.45 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement