Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$64.60
Change+$0.16 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.62B
William Blair Global Leaders I
Price$11.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.5M
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Buy and WGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. WGFIX (42.5M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGFIX (0.22) vs RNPAX (0.00). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (23 years) vs WGFIX (18 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than WGFIX (1.22). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.27 vs. WGFIX (-24.78). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.68 vs. WGFIX (-30.38).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.90 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.22 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.274 | 8.178 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157B | 42.5M | 369,412% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.27 | -24.78 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | -21.88 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.68 | -30.38 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.37 | -4.98 | -1,453% |