Ad is loading...
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$58.07
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.81B
William Blair Global Leaders I
Price$10.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.5M
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Buy and WGFIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. WGFIX (48.5M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGFIX (0.23) vs RNPAX (0.00). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (23 years) vs WGFIX (18 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than WGFIX (1.14). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.52 vs. WGFIX (-33.22). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.17 vs. WGFIX (-22.56).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.90 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.14 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.824 | 0.186 | 981% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 48.5M | 292,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | -33.22 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.31 | -20.88 | -121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.17 | -22.56 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.91 | -12.49 | -440% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...