Ad is loading...
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$58.31
Change-$0.57 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.66B
William Blair Global Leaders I
Price$10.82
Change-$0.12 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.37M
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Buy and WGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 146B vs. WGFIX (52.4M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than WGFIX: RNPAX (0.47) vs WGFIX (0.04). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (23 years) vs WGFIX (17 years). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RNPAX (17.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. WGFIX (-33.38). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.88 vs. WGFIX (-22.08).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.244 | 1.673 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146B | 52.4M | 278,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.04 | 1,259% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | -33.38 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.48 | -32.12 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.88 | -22.08 | -185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.09 | -9.55 | -640% |