Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Hold and WGFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. WGFIX (12.1M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGFIX (1.07) vs RNPAX (0.36). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (24 years) vs WGFIX (19 years). WGFIX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.61 vs. WGFIX (-41.25). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.77 vs. WGFIX (-65.27).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.90 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.72 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.533 | 6.344 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 12.1M | 1,396,694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.07 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.61 | -41.25 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.74 | -52.78 | -64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.77 | -65.27 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.16 | -38.19 | -244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement