Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Buy and WGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. WGFIX (12.8M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGFIX (1.09) vs RNPAX (0.37). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (24 years) vs WGFIX (19 years). WGFIX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.41 vs. WGFIX (-39.00). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.09 vs. WGFIX (-64.52).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.90 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.72 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.455 | 6.042 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 12.8M | 1,328,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 1.09 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.41 | -39.00 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.24 | -55.22 | -53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.09 | -64.52 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.75 | -38.62 | -240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers