Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGFIX
RNPAX vs WGFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGFIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a Hold and WGFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. WGFIX (14.6M). WGFIX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGFIX (1.07) vs RNPAX (0.36). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGFIX: RNPAX (24 years) vs WGFIX (19 years). WGFIX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). WGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGFIX: RNPAX (250) vs WGFIX (500000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.98 vs. WGFIX (-34.70). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.66 vs. WGFIX (-61.80).
| RNPAX | WGFIX | RNPAX / WGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.90 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.72 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.070 | 9.517 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 14.6M | 1,178,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 1.07 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.98 | -34.70 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.06 | -52.59 | -70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.66 | -61.80 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.78 | -32.87 | -334% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement