Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPAX vs WGGNX
RNPAX vs WGGNX Comparison
Open Charts RNPAX vs WGGNX
RNPAX vs WGGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPAX vs. WGGNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPAX is a StrongBuy and WGGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. WGGNX (12.3M). WGGNX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: WGGNX (0.91) vs RNPAX (0.36). RNPAX was incepted earlier than WGGNX: RNPAX (24 years) vs WGGNX (19 years). WGGNX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). WGGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGGNX: RNPAX (250) vs WGGNX (2500). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.70 vs. WGGNX (-41.12). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. WGGNX (-66.28).
| RNPAX | WGGNX | RNPAX / WGGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.15 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.98 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.007 | 7.969 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 12.3M | 1,373,984% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.91 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.70 | -41.12 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.23 | -53.48 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.55 | -66.28 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.01 | -39.94 | -243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement