Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPCX vs SGAAX
RNPCX vs SGAAX Comparison
Open Charts RNPCX vs SGAAX
RNPCX vs SGAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPCX vs. SGAAX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPCX is a Buy and SGAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. SGAAX (139M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than SGAAX: RNPCX (0.71) vs SGAAX (0.00). RNPCX was incepted earlier than SGAAX: RNPCX (24 years) vs SGAAX (13 years). SGAAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.05). SGAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RNPCX (23.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGAAX: RNPCX (250) vs SGAAX (2500). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.58 vs. SGAAX (-15.03). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.07 vs. SGAAX (-37.22).
| RNPCX | SGAAX | RNPCX / SGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.25 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.36 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.220 | -2.389 | -344% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 139M | 119,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.58 | -15.03 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.73 | -17.95 | -221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.07 | -37.22 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.52 | 23.80 | 443% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement