Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPFX vs SGACX
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison
Open Charts RNPFX vs SGACX
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.03
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
Virtus SGA Global Growth C
Price$20.51
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.96M
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPFX vs. SGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPFX is a Hold and SGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. SGACX (218M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than SGACX: RNPFX (0.70) vs SGACX (0.00). RNPFX was incepted earlier than SGACX: RNPFX (23 years) vs SGACX (12 years). SGACX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). SGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGACX: RNPFX (250) vs SGACX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. SGACX (-22.49). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. SGACX (-21.63).
| RNPFX | SGACX | RNPFX / SGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.00 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.17 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.326 | 2.859 | 676% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 218M | 74,771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | -22.49 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.51 | 10.75 | 582% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.47 | -21.63 | -169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.70 | 44.67 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement