Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPFX vs SGACX
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison
Open Charts RNPFX vs SGACX
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
Virtus SGA Global Growth C
Price$20.91
Change+$0.15 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.65M
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPFX vs. SGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPFX is a Buy and SGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. SGACX (232M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than SGACX: RNPFX (0.74) vs SGACX (0.00). RNPFX was incepted earlier than SGACX: RNPFX (23 years) vs SGACX (12 years). SGACX (2.17) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). SGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGACX: RNPFX (250) vs SGACX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.98 vs. SGACX (-18.81). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.70 vs. SGACX (-15.06).
| RNPFX | SGACX | RNPFX / SGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.00 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 2.17 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.587 | 4.112 | 379% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 232M | 68,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.98 | -18.81 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.34 | -5.25 | -673% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.70 | -15.06 | -264% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.56 | 44.98 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement