Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPFX vs SGACX
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison
Open Charts RNPFX vs SGACX
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPFX vs. SGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPFX is a Hold and SGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SGACX (146M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than SGACX: RNPFX (1.18) vs SGACX (0.00). RNPFX was incepted earlier than SGACX: RNPFX (24 years) vs SGACX (13 years). SGACX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). SGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGACX: RNPFX (250) vs SGACX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.73 vs. SGACX (-19.45). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.55 vs. SGACX (-42.96).
| RNPFX | SGACX | RNPFX / SGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 2.00 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 2.12 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.578 | -6.887 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 146M | 117,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.73 | -19.45 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.12 | -24.36 | -177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.55 | -42.96 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.31 | 15.13 | 841% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement