Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPFX vs SGACX
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison
Open Charts RNPFX vs SGACX
RNPFX vs SGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPFX vs. SGACX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPFX is a StrongBuy and SGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. SGACX (128M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than SGACX: RNPFX (1.18) vs SGACX (0.00). RNPFX was incepted earlier than SGACX: RNPFX (24 years) vs SGACX (13 years). SGACX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). SGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGACX: RNPFX (250) vs SGACX (2500). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.30 vs. SGACX (-18.61). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.12 vs. SGACX (-44.46).
| RNPFX | SGACX | RNPFX / SGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 2.00 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 2.12 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.762 | -4.667 | -145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 128M | 132,031% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.30 | -18.61 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.21 | -26.24 | -157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.12 | -44.46 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.42 | 9.22 | 1,230% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement