Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPFX vs WCMGX
RNPFX vs WCMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNPFX vs WCMGX
RNPFX vs WCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPFX vs. WCMGX commentary
Jun 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPFX is a Hold and WCMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. WCMGX (1.56B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than WCMGX: RNPFX (1.18) vs WCMGX (0.52). RNPFX was incepted earlier than WCMGX: RNPFX (24 years) vs WCMGX (13 years). WCMGX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). WCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMGX: RNPFX (250) vs WCMGX (100000). WCMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.10 vs. RNPFX (9.37). WCMGX return over 5 years is better than : 37.06 vs. RNPFX (15.53).
| RNPFX | WCMGX | RNPFX / WCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.97 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.97 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.544 | 6.013 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 1.56B | 11,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.52 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.37 | 12.10 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.31 | 80.89 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.53 | 37.06 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.21 | 174.70 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement