Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPFX vs WCMGX
RNPFX vs WCMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNPFX vs WCMGX
RNPFX vs WCMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPFX vs. WCMGX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPFX is a Buy and WCMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. WCMGX (1.7B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than WCMGX: RNPFX (1.21) vs WCMGX (0.41). RNPFX was incepted earlier than WCMGX: RNPFX (24 years) vs WCMGX (13 years). WCMGX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). WCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMGX: RNPFX (250) vs WCMGX (100000). WCMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.57 vs. RNPFX (8.90). WCMGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.42 vs. RNPFX (16.21).
| RNPFX | WCMGX | RNPFX / WCMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.97 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.97 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.229 | 12.759 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 1.7B | 9,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.41 | 297% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.90 | 16.57 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.13 | 86.92 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.21 | 34.42 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.49 | 174.56 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers