Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPGX vs SCGVX
RNPGX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts RNPGX vs SCGVX
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$73.93
Change+$0.33 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
Sands Capital Global Growth I
Price$33.60
Change+$0.34 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
RNPGX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPGX vs. SCGVX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPGX is a Buy and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. SCGVX (1.17B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: RNPGX (0.77) vs SCGVX (0.00). RNPGX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: RNPGX (16 years) vs SCGVX (15 years). SCGVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). RNPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCGVX (17.00). RNPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: RNPGX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. SCGVX (13.05). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.44 vs. SCGVX (-0.98).
| RNPGX | SCGVX | RNPGX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.21 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.21 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.954 | 13.632 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 1.17B | 13,884% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.21 | 13.05 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.57 | 51.80 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.44 | -0.98 | -4,218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.34 | 99.61 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement