Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPGX vs SCGVX
RNPGX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts RNPGX vs SCGVX
American Funds New Perspective R6
Price$74.75
Change+$0.42 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
Sands Capital Global Growth I
Price$33.42
Change+$0.39 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
RNPGX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPGX vs. SCGVX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPGX is a Buy and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. SCGVX (1.16B). RNPGX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: RNPGX (0.75) vs SCGVX (0.00). RNPGX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: RNPGX (16 years) vs SCGVX (16 years). SCGVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.41). RNPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCGVX (17.00). RNPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: RNPGX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.35 vs. SCGVX (10.36). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 37.14 vs. SCGVX (-9.83).
| RNPGX | SCGVX | RNPGX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.21 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.21 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.274 | 12.846 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 1.16B | 14,114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.35 | 10.36 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.68 | 61.20 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.14 | -9.83 | -378% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.92 | 97.17 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement