Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNPGX vs SCGVX
RNPGX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts RNPGX vs SCGVX
RNPGX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNPGX vs. SCGVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNPGX is a Hold and SCGVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPGX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. SCGVX (794M). RNPGX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: RNPGX (1.23) vs SCGVX (0.00). RNPGX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: RNPGX (17 years) vs SCGVX (16 years). SCGVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNPGX (0.40). SCGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RNPGX (23.00). RNPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: RNPGX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). RNPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. SCGVX (-27.84). RNPGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.82 vs. SCGVX (-45.31).
| RNPGX | SCGVX | RNPGX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.22 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.22 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.608 | 3.030 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 794M | 21,662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | -27.84 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.37 | -9.13 | -475% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.82 | -45.31 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.90 | 37.12 | 345% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement