Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWAX vs SEKCX
RNWAX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWAX vs SEKCX
RNWAX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWAX vs. SEKCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWAX is a Hold and SEKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SEKCX (84.5M). SEKCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: SEKCX (1.29) vs RNWAX (0.49). RNWAX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: RNWAX (24 years) vs SEKCX (25 years). SEKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKCX: RNWAX (250) vs SEKCX (1000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.27 vs. RNWAX (25.32). SEKCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.09 vs. RNWAX (10.80).
| RNWAX | SEKCX | RNWAX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.90 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.43 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.657 | 37.239 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 84.5M | 107,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.29 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.32 | 62.27 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.96 | 94.06 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.80 | 30.09 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.29 | 141.37 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement