Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWAX vs ZEMAX
RNWAX vs ZEMAX Comparison
Open Charts RNWAX vs ZEMAX
RNWAX vs ZEMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWAX vs. ZEMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWAX is a Hold and ZEMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ZEMAX (350M). ZEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: ZEMAX (1.40) vs RNWAX (0.49). RNWAX was incepted earlier than ZEMAX: RNWAX (24 years) vs ZEMAX (8 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than ZEMAX (1.33). ZEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZEMAX: RNWAX (250) vs ZEMAX (100000). ZEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.06 vs. RNWAX (25.32). ZEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.65 vs. RNWAX (10.80).
| RNWAX | ZEMAX | RNWAX / ZEMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.93 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.33 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.657 | 27.718 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 350M | 25,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.40 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.32 | 36.06 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.96 | 81.84 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.80 | 25.65 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement