Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SBEMX
RNWBX vs SBEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SBEMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Instl
Price$11.64
Change-$0.12 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.52M
RNWBX vs SBEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SBEMX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. SBEMX (85.5M). SBEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SBEMX (5.08) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SBEMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SBEMX (14 years). SBEMX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). SBEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBEMX: RNWBX (250) vs SBEMX (250000). SBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.46 vs. RNWBX (18.50). SBEMX return over 5 years is better than : 67.36 vs. RNWBX (16.42).
| RNWBX | SBEMX | RNWBX / SBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.99 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.82 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.046 | 30.958 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 85.5M | 87,602% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 5.08 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.50 | 30.46 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.20 | 83.97 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.42 | 67.36 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.43 | 131.03 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement