Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SBEMX
RNWBX vs SBEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SBEMX
RNWBX vs SBEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SBEMX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a StrongBuy and SBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. SBEMX (109M). SBEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SBEMX (2.23) vs RNWBX (0.41). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SBEMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SBEMX (15 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than SBEMX (1.53). SBEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBEMX: RNWBX (250) vs SBEMX (250000). SBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.15 vs. RNWBX (15.89). SBEMX return over 5 years is better than : 83.91 vs. RNWBX (12.78).
| RNWBX | SBEMX | RNWBX / SBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.84 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.53 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.677 | 24.725 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 109M | 82,569% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 2.23 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.89 | 35.15 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.10 | 108.05 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.78 | 83.91 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.87 | 178.08 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement