Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SEKCX
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SEKCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.97
Change+$0.63 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.38B
DWS Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$18.43
Change+$0.21 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.71M
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SEKCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SEKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. SEKCX (60.7M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than SEKCX: RNWBX (0.13) vs SEKCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SEKCX (24 years). SEKCX (2.34) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKCX: RNWBX (250) vs SEKCX (1000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.20 vs. RNWBX (14.06). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.44 vs. SEKCX (3.82).
| RNWBX | SEKCX | RNWBX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.92 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.34 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.246 | 14.900 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.4B | 60.7M | 117,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.06 | 16.20 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.53 | 27.37 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.44 | 3.82 | 561% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.15 | 56.99 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement