Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SEKCX
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SEKCX
RNWBX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SEKCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SEKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SEKCX (84.5M). SEKCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SEKCX (1.29) vs RNWBX (0.41). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SEKCX (25 years). SEKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEKCX: RNWBX (250) vs SEKCX (1000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.27 vs. RNWBX (25.30). SEKCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.09 vs. RNWBX (10.81).
| RNWBX | SEKCX | RNWBX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.90 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.43 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.640 | 37.239 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 84.5M | 107,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.29 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.30 | 62.27 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.91 | 94.06 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.81 | 30.09 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.35 | 141.37 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement