Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SEMGX
RNWBX vs SEMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SEMGX
RNWBX vs SEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SEMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SEMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. SEMGX (79.2M). SEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SEMGX (2.26) vs RNWBX (0.41). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SEMGX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SEMGX (30 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than SEMGX (1.47). SEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMGX: RNWBX (250) vs SEMGX (2500). SEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.61 vs. RNWBX (18.14). SEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 31.71 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| RNWBX | SEMGX | RNWBX / SEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.98 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.47 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.082 | 29.176 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 79.2M | 114,520% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 2.26 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.14 | 48.61 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.22 | 79.38 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.30 | 31.71 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.97 | 128.51 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement