Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFGIX
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFGIX
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
Seafarer Overseas Gr and Income Investor
Price$14.21
Change-$0.11 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.12B
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFGIX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SFGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. SFGIX (3.12B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFGIX (2.35) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SFGIX (14 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SFGIX (0.96). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFGIX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWBX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.03 vs. RNWBX (11.48). RNWBX (25.41) and SFGIX (25.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RNWBX | SFGIX | RNWBX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.96 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.96 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.671 | 25.450 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2B | 3.12B | 2,409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 2.35 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 15.03 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.43 | 43.87 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.41 | 25.39 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.19 | 57.53 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement