Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFGIX
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFGIX
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.12B
Seafarer Overseas Gr and Income Investor
Price$13.58
Change+$0.15 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.14B
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFGIX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SFGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. SFGIX (3.14B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFGIX (2.50) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SFGIX (13 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SFGIX (0.96). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFGIX (5.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWBX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.38 vs. RNWBX (10.50). SFGIX return over 5 years is better than : 31.59 vs. RNWBX (27.64).
| RNWBX | SFGIX | RNWBX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.96 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.96 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.935 | 17.653 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.1B | 3.14B | 2,230% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 2.50 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.50 | 13.38 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.23 | 26.40 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.64 | 31.59 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.65 | 38.00 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement