Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFGIX
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFGIX
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFGIX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SFGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. SFGIX (3.66B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFGIX (4.69) vs RNWBX (0.41). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SFGIX (14 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than SFGIX (0.97). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFGIX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWBX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.71 vs. RNWBX (16.11). SFGIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.28 vs. RNWBX (8.81).
| RNWBX | SFGIX | RNWBX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.97 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.97 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.594 | 13.348 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 3.66B | 2,479% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 4.69 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.11 | 27.71 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.69 | 45.41 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.81 | 22.28 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.96 | 75.70 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement