Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFGIX
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFGIX
RNWBX vs SFGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFGIX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a StrongBuy and SFGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. SFGIX (3.64B). SFGIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFGIX (4.72) vs RNWBX (0.42). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFGIX: RNWBX (24 years) vs SFGIX (15 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than SFGIX (0.97). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFGIX (18.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFGIX: RNWBX (250) vs SFGIX (2500). SFGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.10 vs. RNWBX (18.88). SFGIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.27 vs. RNWBX (15.20).
| RNWBX | SFGIX | RNWBX / SFGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.97 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.97 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.756 | 20.667 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 3.64B | 2,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 4.72 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.88 | 32.10 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.28 | 58.79 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.20 | 32.27 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.68 | 84.06 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement