Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TCEMX
RNWBX vs TCEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TCEMX
RNWBX vs TCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TCEMX commentary
Jul 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and TCEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. TCEMX (320M). RNWBX (0.41) and TCEMX (0.41) have matching dividends . RNWBX was incepted earlier than TCEMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs TCEMX (20 years). TCEMX (2.76) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. TCEMX (16.75). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCEMX: RNWBX (250) vs TCEMX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.14 vs. TCEMX (12.46). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.30 vs. TCEMX (3.59).
| RNWBX | TCEMX | RNWBX / TCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.51 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.76 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.082 | 12.344 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 320M | 28,344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.41 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.14 | 12.46 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.22 | 36.05 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.30 | 3.59 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.97 | 45.67 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement