Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TEMRX
RNWBX vs TEMRX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TEMRX
RNWBX vs TEMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TEMRX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and TEMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. TEMRX (1.77B). TEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: TEMRX (2.70) vs RNWBX (0.41). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TEMRX: RNWBX (24 years) vs TEMRX (16 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than TEMRX (1.28). TEMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEMRX: RNWBX (250) vs TEMRX (2500). TEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.93 vs. RNWBX (13.23). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 13.73 vs. TEMRX (12.63).
| RNWBX | TEMRX | RNWBX / TEMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.28 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.28 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.708 | 17.174 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 1.77B | 5,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 2.70 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.23 | 24.93 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.13 | 72.38 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.73 | 12.63 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.25 | 40.02 | 238% |