Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TRGZX
RNWBX vs TRGZX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TRGZX
RNWBX vs TRGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TRGZX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and TRGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. TRGZX (7.26B). TRGZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: TRGZX (1.52) vs RNWBX (0.41). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TRGZX: RNWBX (24 years) vs TRGZX (6 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than TRGZX (0.97). TRGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.20 vs. RNWBX (46.00). TRGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: TRGZX (0) vs RNWBX (250). TRGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.99 vs. RNWBX (28.07). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.29 vs. TRGZX (12.82).
| RNWBX | TRGZX | RNWBX / TRGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.97 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.252 | 31.409 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 7.26B | 1,179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.52 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.07 | 64.99 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.49 | 75.15 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.29 | 12.82 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement