Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TRGZX
RNWBX vs TRGZX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TRGZX
RNWBX vs TRGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TRGZX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TRGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. TRGZX (6.66B). TRGZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: TRGZX (1.59) vs RNWBX (0.42). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TRGZX: RNWBX (24 years) vs TRGZX (6 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than TRGZX (0.97). TRGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.20 vs. RNWBX (46.00). TRGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: TRGZX (0) vs RNWBX (250). TRGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.82 vs. RNWBX (20.43). TRGZX return over 5 years is better than : 14.59 vs. RNWBX (12.95).
| RNWBX | TRGZX | RNWBX / TRGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.97 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.344 | 22.328 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 6.66B | 1,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.59 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.43 | 45.82 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.93 | 56.33 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.95 | 14.59 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.57 | N/A | - |