Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TSMGX
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.40
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.85B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$16.16
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TSMGX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TSMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. TSMGX (1.94B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWBX (0.13) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than TSMGX (1.57). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (17.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWBX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). TSMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. RNWBX (10.29). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.44 vs. TSMGX (8.45).
| RNWBX | TSMGX | RNWBX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.44 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.57 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.752 | 14.691 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.8B | 1.94B | 3,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.29 | 11.29 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 22.15 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.44 | 8.45 | 360% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement