Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TSMGX
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.88
Change+$0.26 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.51B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$16.85
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TSMGX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and TSMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.5B vs. TSMGX (2.07B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWBX (0.12) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). RNWBX (1.67) and TSMGX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWBX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. TSMGX (10.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.45 vs. TSMGX (-9.78).
| RNWBX | TSMGX | RNWBX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.44 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.59 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.562 | 19.659 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.5B | 2.07B | 3,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 10.27 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 41.32 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.45 | -9.78 | -250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement