Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TSMGX
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.20
Change+$1.02 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.42B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$15.82
Change+$0.26 (+1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TSMGX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TSMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.4B vs. TSMGX (1.9B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWBX (0.13) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than TSMGX (1.57). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWBX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.47 vs. TSMGX (8.51). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.91 vs. TSMGX (-7.70).
| RNWBX | TSMGX | RNWBX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.44 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.57 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.199 | 10.433 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.4B | 1.9B | 3,707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.47 | 8.51 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 11.06 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.91 | -7.70 | -284% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement