Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TSMGX
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.55
Change-$0.71 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.45B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$16.95
Change-$0.07 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TSMGX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and TSMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. TSMGX (2.06B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWBX (0.13) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TSMGX (7 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than TSMGX (1.57). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWBX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.27 vs. TSMGX (10.02). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.84 vs. TSMGX (-1.85).
| RNWBX | TSMGX | RNWBX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.44 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.57 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.754 | 20.795 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.4B | 2.06B | 3,605% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.27 | 10.02 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.40 | 38.94 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.84 | -1.85 | -1,560% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers