Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TSMGX
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TSMGX
RNWBX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TSMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and TSMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. TSMGX (2.37B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: RNWBX (0.41) vs TSMGX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: RNWBX (24 years) vs TSMGX (8 years). RNWBX (1.66) and TSMGX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . TSMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSMGX: RNWBX (250) vs TSMGX (2500). TSMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.94 vs. RNWBX (18.14). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.30 vs. TSMGX (-8.12).
| RNWBX | TSMGX | RNWBX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.44 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.59 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.082 | 20.473 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 2.37B | 3,830% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.14 | 28.94 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.22 | 47.22 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.30 | -8.12 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement