Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs UMEMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.86
Change-$1.00 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst
Price$14.43
Change-$0.21 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets757.85M
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. UMEMX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and UMEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. UMEMX (758M). UMEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: UMEMX (1.21) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than UMEMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs UMEMX (27 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than UMEMX (1.29). UMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMEMX: RNWBX (250) vs UMEMX (2000). UMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.54 vs. RNWBX (7.09). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.56 vs. UMEMX (12.15).
| RNWBX | UMEMX | RNWBX / UMEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.29 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.298 | 9.567 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.7B | 758M | 8,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.21 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.09 | 11.54 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.44 | 20.16 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.56 | 12.15 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.60 | 44.00 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement