Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs UMEMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.86
Change-$2.47 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.18B
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst
Price$16.26
Change-$0.72 (-4.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets773M
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. UMEMX commentary
Oct 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and UMEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. UMEMX (773M). UMEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: UMEMX (1.02) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than UMEMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs UMEMX (28 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than UMEMX (1.29). UMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMEMX: RNWBX (250) vs UMEMX (2000). UMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.72 vs. RNWBX (10.26). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.22 vs. UMEMX (6.28).
| RNWBX | UMEMX | RNWBX / UMEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.29 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.816 | 28.929 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2B | 773M | 9,728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.02 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.26 | 22.72 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.37 | 63.74 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.22 | 6.28 | 338% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.13 | 91.84 | 92% |