Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs UMEMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst
Price$15.49
Change+$0.07 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets732.29M
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. UMEMX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and UMEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. UMEMX (732M). UMEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: UMEMX (1.13) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than UMEMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs UMEMX (28 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than UMEMX (1.29). UMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMEMX: RNWBX (250) vs UMEMX (2000). UMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.55 vs. RNWBX (12.87). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. UMEMX (3.80).
| RNWBX | UMEMX | RNWBX / UMEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.29 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.729 | 17.084 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.4B | 732M | 9,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.13 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | 18.55 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.09 | 25.71 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.93 | 3.80 | 604% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.17 | 70.46 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement