Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. UMEMX commentary
Aug 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and UMEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. UMEMX (791M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than UMEMX: RNWBX (0.42) vs UMEMX (0.27). RNWBX was incepted earlier than UMEMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs UMEMX (29 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than UMEMX (1.34). UMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMEMX: RNWBX (250) vs UMEMX (2000). UMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.34 vs. RNWBX (20.43). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.95 vs. UMEMX (10.00).
| RNWBX | UMEMX | RNWBX / UMEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.13 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.34 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.344 | 22.155 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 791M | 11,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.27 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.43 | 34.34 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.93 | 61.83 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.95 | 10.00 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.57 | 109.52 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers