Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. UMEMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and UMEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. UMEMX (920M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than UMEMX: RNWBX (0.41) vs UMEMX (0.24). RNWBX was incepted earlier than UMEMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs UMEMX (28 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than UMEMX (1.34). UMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMEMX: RNWBX (250) vs UMEMX (2000). UMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.45 vs. RNWBX (29.69). UMEMX return over 5 years is better than : 18.34 vs. RNWBX (15.20).
| RNWBX | UMEMX | RNWBX / UMEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.13 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.34 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.201 | 40.536 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 920M | 9,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.24 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.69 | 61.45 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.51 | 94.36 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.20 | 18.34 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.04 | 163.21 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers