Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs UMEMX
RNWBX vs UMEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. UMEMX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a StrongBuy and UMEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. UMEMX (836M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than UMEMX: RNWBX (0.41) vs UMEMX (0.25). RNWBX was incepted earlier than UMEMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs UMEMX (29 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than UMEMX (1.34). UMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMEMX: RNWBX (250) vs UMEMX (2000). UMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.25 vs. RNWBX (19.81). UMEMX (12.32) and RNWBX (11.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RNWBX | UMEMX | RNWBX / UMEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.13 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.34 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.015 | 30.128 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 836M | 10,598% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.25 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.81 | 37.25 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.77 | 79.37 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.95 | 12.32 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.44 | 116.61 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers