Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAEMX
RNWBX vs WAEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAEMX
RNWBX vs WAEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAEMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and WAEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. WAEMX (108M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than WAEMX: RNWBX (0.41) vs WAEMX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAEMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs WAEMX (19 years). WAEMX (2.05) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. WAEMX (38.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAEMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAEMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.69 vs. WAEMX (-20.88). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.20 vs. WAEMX (-44.67).
| RNWBX | WAEMX | RNWBX / WAEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.95 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.05 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.201 | 27.059 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 108M | 84,167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.69 | -20.88 | -142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.51 | -20.59 | -255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.20 | -44.67 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.04 | -8.72 | -1,400% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers