Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAEMX
RNWBX vs WAEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAEMX
RNWBX vs WAEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAEMX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and WAEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. WAEMX (108M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than WAEMX: RNWBX (0.41) vs WAEMX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAEMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs WAEMX (19 years). WAEMX (2.05) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. WAEMX (38.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAEMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAEMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.07 vs. WAEMX (-21.77). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.29 vs. WAEMX (-45.27).
| RNWBX | WAEMX | RNWBX / WAEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.95 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.05 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.252 | 24.706 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 108M | 79,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.07 | -21.77 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.49 | -22.91 | -225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.29 | -45.27 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.19 | -12.62 | -881% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers