Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAESX
RNWBX vs WAESX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAESX
RNWBX vs WAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAESX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and WAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. WAESX (166M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than WAESX: RNWBX (0.41) vs WAESX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAESX: RNWBX (24 years) vs WAESX (14 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than WAESX (1.37). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. WAESX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAESX: RNWBX (250) vs WAESX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.31 vs. WAESX (7.77). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 10.54 vs. WAESX (-6.77).
| RNWBX | WAESX | RNWBX / WAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.37 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.37 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.659 | 5.873 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 166M | 54,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.31 | 7.77 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.06 | 25.18 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.54 | -6.77 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.96 | 123.52 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers