Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.55
Change-$0.71 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.45B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.81
Change-$0.03 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.41M
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAFMX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and WAFMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. WAFMX (35.4M). WAFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WAFMX (0.69) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.27 vs. WAFMX (2.87). WAFMX (29.92) and RNWBX (28.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RNWBX | WAFMX | RNWBX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.20 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.754 | 11.304 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.4B | 35.4M | 210,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.69 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.27 | 2.87 | 427% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.40 | 58.52 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.84 | 29.92 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.01 | 40.71 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement