Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.84
Change+$0.02 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.42M
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. WAFMX (37.4M). WAFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WAFMX (0.68) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WAFMX (13 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). WAFMX (8.70) and RNWBX (8.48) have marching annual gain over last year. WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 35.10 vs. RNWBX (24.16).
| RNWBX | WAFMX | RNWBX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.20 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.337 | 10.725 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.1B | 37.4M | 187,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.68 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.48 | 8.70 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.04 | 57.70 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.16 | 35.10 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.88 | 30.55 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement