Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.18
Change-$0.22 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.71M
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAFMX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. WAFMX (35.7M). WAFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WAFMX (0.71) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. WAFMX (9.54). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 27.05 vs. RNWBX (20.62).
| RNWBX | WAFMX | RNWBX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.20 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.812 | 8.116 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.6B | 35.7M | 197,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.71 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 9.54 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.48 | 31.83 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.62 | 27.05 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.11 | 28.34 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement