Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAFMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a StrongBuy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. WAFMX (20.4M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWBX (0.41) vs WAFMX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs WAFMX (15 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). WAFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.89 vs. WAFMX (-4.69). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.78 vs. WAFMX (-18.71).
| RNWBX | WAFMX | RNWBX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.96 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.677 | 1.667 | 941% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 20.4M | 441,176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.89 | -4.69 | -339% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.10 | 25.40 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.78 | -18.71 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.87 | 42.88 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers