Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WAFMX
RNWBX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and WAFMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. WAFMX (23.1M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: RNWBX (0.41) vs WAFMX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: RNWBX (24 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). WAFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WAFMX (2000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.14 vs. WAFMX (-1.32). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.30 vs. WAFMX (-10.23).
| RNWBX | WAFMX | RNWBX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.96 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 2.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.082 | 4.167 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 23.1M | 392,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.14 | -1.32 | -1,379% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.22 | 28.05 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.30 | -10.23 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.97 | 43.63 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement