Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs ZEMAX
RNWBX vs ZEMAX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs ZEMAX
RNWBX vs ZEMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. ZEMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and ZEMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ZEMAX (350M). ZEMAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: ZEMAX (1.40) vs RNWBX (0.41). RNWBX was incepted earlier than ZEMAX: RNWBX (24 years) vs ZEMAX (8 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than ZEMAX (1.33). ZEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZEMAX: RNWBX (250) vs ZEMAX (100000). ZEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.06 vs. RNWBX (25.30). ZEMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.65 vs. RNWBX (10.81).
| RNWBX | ZEMAX | RNWBX / ZEMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.93 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.33 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.640 | 27.718 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 350M | 25,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.40 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.30 | 36.06 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.91 | 81.84 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.81 | 25.65 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement