Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs ZEMIX
RNWBX vs ZEMIX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs ZEMIX
RNWBX vs ZEMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. ZEMIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and ZEMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ZEMIX (350M). ZEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: ZEMIX (1.46) vs RNWBX (0.41). RNWBX was incepted earlier than ZEMIX: RNWBX (24 years) vs ZEMIX (8 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than ZEMIX (1.12). ZEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZEMIX: RNWBX (250) vs ZEMIX (250000). ZEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.17 vs. RNWBX (29.69). ZEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. RNWBX (15.20).
| RNWBX | ZEMIX | RNWBX / ZEMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.86 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.12 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.201 | 33.548 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 350M | 25,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.46 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.69 | 41.17 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.51 | 89.17 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.20 | 31.66 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement