Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs RREMX
RNWFX vs RREMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs RREMX
RNWFX vs RREMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. RREMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and RREMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. RREMX (6.42B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than RREMX: RNWFX (1.19) vs RREMX (1.06). RNWFX was incepted earlier than RREMX: RNWFX (24 years) vs RREMX (10 years). RREMX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RREMX (20.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RREMX: RNWFX (250) vs RREMX (250000). RREMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.71 vs. RNWFX (19.68). RREMX return over 5 years is better than : 51.04 vs. RNWFX (14.77).
| RNWFX | RREMX | RNWFX / RREMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.88 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.89 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.700 | 21.866 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 6.42B | 1,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.06 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.68 | 38.71 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.28 | 69.04 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.77 | 51.04 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.07 | N/A | - |