Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs SBEMX
RNWFX vs SBEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs SBEMX
RNWFX vs SBEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. SBEMX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and SBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SBEMX (106M). SBEMX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: SBEMX (2.21) vs RNWFX (1.20). RNWFX was incepted earlier than SBEMX: RNWFX (24 years) vs SBEMX (15 years). SBEMX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). SBEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBEMX: RNWFX (250) vs SBEMX (250000). SBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.22 vs. RNWFX (23.90). SBEMX return over 5 years is better than : 75.97 vs. RNWFX (16.08).
| RNWFX | SBEMX | RNWFX / SBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.68 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.186 | 25.064 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 106M | 85,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.21 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.90 | 48.22 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.35 | 108.62 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.08 | 75.97 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.88 | 211.32 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers