Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs SBHEX
RNWFX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs SBHEX
RNWFX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. SBHEX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and SBHEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SBHEX (103M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: SBHEX (2.09) vs RNWFX (1.19). RNWFX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWFX (24 years) vs SBHEX (12 years). SBHEX (2.10) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWFX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.41 vs. RNWFX (20.53). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 69.82 vs. RNWFX (15.04).
| RNWFX | SBHEX | RNWFX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.14 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.684 | 20.493 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 103M | 88,252% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 2.09 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.53 | 38.41 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.44 | 99.21 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.04 | 69.82 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.29 | 179.95 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers