Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs SBHEX
RNWFX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs SBHEX
RNWFX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. SBHEX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and SBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SBHEX (106M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: SBHEX (2.13) vs RNWFX (1.20). RNWFX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWFX (24 years) vs SBHEX (12 years). SBHEX (2.10) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWFX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.05 vs. RNWFX (23.90). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 74.77 vs. RNWFX (16.08).
| RNWFX | SBHEX | RNWFX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.14 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.186 | 25.085 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 106M | 85,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.13 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.90 | 48.05 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.35 | 107.56 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.08 | 74.77 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.88 | 205.61 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers