Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs SBHEX
RNWFX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs SBHEX
RNWFX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. SBHEX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a StrongBuy and SBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. SBHEX (108M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: SBHEX (2.26) vs RNWFX (1.22). RNWFX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWFX (24 years) vs SBHEX (12 years). SBHEX (1.95) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWFX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.90 vs. RNWFX (22.59). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 91.86 vs. RNWFX (23.78).
| RNWFX | SBHEX | RNWFX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.95 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.094 | 23.639 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 108M | 82,037% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 2.26 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.59 | 39.90 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.61 | 109.52 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.78 | 91.86 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.30 | 166.14 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers