Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs SFVLX
RNWFX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs SFVLX
RNWFX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. SFVLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a StrongBuy and SFVLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. SFVLX (162M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: SFVLX (3.10) vs RNWFX (1.20). RNWFX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWFX (24 years) vs SFVLX (10 years). SFVLX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWFX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.39 vs. SFVLX (15.51). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 59.39 vs. RNWFX (18.43).
| RNWFX | SFVLX | RNWFX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.19 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.517 | 12.367 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 162M | 55,556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 3.10 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.39 | 15.51 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.50 | 52.09 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.43 | 59.39 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.22 | 140.80 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement