Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs SFVLX
RNWFX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs SFVLX
RNWFX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. SFVLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a StrongBuy and SFVLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. SFVLX (157M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: SFVLX (3.19) vs RNWFX (1.22). RNWFX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWFX (24 years) vs SFVLX (10 years). SFVLX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWFX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.59 vs. SFVLX (17.80). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 61.56 vs. RNWFX (23.78).
| RNWFX | SFVLX | RNWFX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.19 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.094 | 10.355 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 157M | 56,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 3.19 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.59 | 17.80 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.61 | 51.23 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.78 | 61.56 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.30 | 135.34 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers