Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs SFVLX
RNWFX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs SFVLX
RNWFX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. SFVLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Hold and SFVLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SFVLX (160M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: SFVLX (3.14) vs RNWFX (1.20). RNWFX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWFX (24 years) vs SFVLX (10 years). SFVLX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWFX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.39 vs. SFVLX (25.32). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 53.70 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| RNWFX | SFVLX | RNWFX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.19 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.794 | 7.574 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 160M | 56,813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 3.14 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.39 | 25.32 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.06 | 47.20 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.98 | 53.70 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.60 | 141.85 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement