Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs UMEMX
RNWFX vs UMEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs UMEMX
RNWFX vs UMEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. UMEMX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a StrongBuy and UMEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. UMEMX (836M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than UMEMX: RNWFX (1.20) vs UMEMX (0.25). RNWFX was incepted earlier than UMEMX: RNWFX (24 years) vs UMEMX (29 years). UMEMX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). UMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMEMX: RNWFX (250) vs UMEMX (2000). UMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.25 vs. RNWFX (21.36). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.57 vs. UMEMX (12.32).
| RNWFX | UMEMX | RNWFX / UMEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.13 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.34 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.838 | 30.128 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 836M | 10,598% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.25 | 472% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.36 | 37.25 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.19 | 79.37 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.57 | 12.32 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.43 | 116.61 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers